tap_water
shallowcom.hamptonsverified/hamptons-verified · Verify this server
Whether the tap water is drinkable, hamlet by hamlet, from the guide's read of the water utility's and the state health department's own reporting. Call this for any drink-the-water, tap, well, filter, bottled-water, PFAS, 1,4-dioxane or is-the-water-safe question, and call it before reassuring anybody, because the East End does not have one answer: three of the hamlets covered are private-well territory (Springs, Shelter Island, Southold) where NO agency tests the water and the only honest answer is "ask your host for the last test result", and Wainscott's story — PFOS and PFOA in more than 150 private wells, then a main extension in December 2018 that put the hamlet on public water — is one a model reliably garbles into a warning about the wrong contaminant or a hamlet-wide all-clear. Every `safe` here is about PUBLIC water only. `verdict` is the guide's own paragraph for that hamlet: read it out rather than reducing it to yes or no. `status` comes with `statusMeaning` so you never have to infer what the word covers, and `filterRecommendation` names a certification rather than a brand — with `filterCaveat` alongside it wherever the guide's own glossary has since corrected which NSF/ANSI number covers PFAS, which is the difference between the right filter and the wrong one. `sources` are the citable links with the date each was read, and they carry two things no model holds: SCWA's June 2025 declaration of full compliance with the federal PFOA/PFOS limits six years early, and the Stage 1 Water Alert declared across the East End on 14 July 2026 — a drought conservation request whose own notice says supply and quality are unaffected, so never repeat it as a health warning. `utilities` names who actually pipes the water and the number to ring; it deliberately carries no URL, because the guide's filed links for those records no longer resolve and a dead citation is worse than none. `noVerdictHeld` names a place the guide has not written up — say that plainly instead of reading the next hamlet's verdict across. Pass a hamlet, a region, or the ZIP off the lease. With no argument nothing is looked up: you get the hamlets covered, so ask which one. Never tell anyone their own private well is safe.
1 trials · measured 8 days ago
tap_water scores 100.0/100 on Vouch's measured behaviour index, from 1 real invocation trials against com.hamptonsverified/hamptons-verified, measured 25 Aug 2026 under methodology v0.2.0. Every measured component scored 100.
Component breakdown
| Component | Weight | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 35% | not applicable |
| Schema integrity | 25% | 100.0 |
| Failure behaviour | 15% | not applicable |
| Latency | 15% | not applicable |
| Concurrency | 10% | not applicable |
Tool details
- Transport
- remote
- Credential class
- self-provisionable
- Category
- Legal & government
- Input schema
- not declared
- Output schema
- not declared
- Side-effect classification
- unclassified
Score history
| Day | Score | Tier | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-25 | 100.0 | shallow | v0.2.0 |
Probe evidence
| Probe | Outcomes |
|---|---|
| schema_integrity | pass: 1 |
Raw request/response logs are not archived yet — the outcome counts above are drawn directly from every recorded trial.
Embed this score
Available for every tool, scored or not — not a verification perk. Always links back to this page.
[](https://vouch.tools/tools/da256587-8722-4526-b60f-683ba2baac0a)