check_wallet_in_token
shallowcom.cabal-hunter.api/cabal-hunter · Verify this server
Is a SPECIFIC wallet involved in a SPECIFIC Solana token? Use this when a user names a wallet they are worried about, or when your agent keeps its own watchlist of addresses and wants to screen a token against one. Answers from two sources at once: 1. the traced holders of that token — rank, % of supply, buy slot, whether it funded a coordinated cluster, whether it created the token, or whether it is the liquidity pool / a labelled exchange wallet 2. a LIVE on-chain holding lookup, so a wallet too small to appear in the trace is still resolved rather than dismissed HOW TO READ THE RESULT — this matters more than the fields: found_in_scan=false is NOT a clean bill of health. The trace covers the largest holders, so a smaller position sits outside it, and a wallet that sold out and closed its token account leaves nothing to observe. Never tell a user a wallet is 'clean' or 'not involved' on this result. The `note` field states the limit of what was actually checked; relay it. holding.sold_out=true is the strong signal: a token account exists holding none of the token, i.e. this wallet HELD it and has since sold out. track_record, when present, counts earlier tokens the wallet was early in and how many graduated. It is an association measured out-of-sample, NOT a profit signal and not a recommendation to copy or avoid anyone. Absence of a track record means we hold no record, not that the wallet has no history. Free, no API key, rate limited per caller. For screening MANY wallets on every scan automatically, the Screen List add-on stores a private list per key: POST /api/screen-list/checkout.
1 trials · measured 27 days ago
check_wallet_in_token scores 100.0/100 on Vouch's measured behaviour index, from 1 real invocation trials against com.cabal-hunter.api/cabal-hunter, measured 11 Sept 2026 under methodology v0.2.0. Every measured component scored 100.
Component breakdown
| Component | Weight | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 35% | not applicable |
| Schema integrity | 25% | 100.0 |
| Failure behaviour | 15% | not applicable |
| Latency | 15% | not applicable |
| Concurrency | 10% | not applicable |
Tool details
- Transport
- remote
- Credential class
- self-provisionable
- Category
- Developer infrastructure
- Input schema
- not declared
- Output schema
- not declared
- Side-effect classification
- unclassified
Score history
| Day | Score | Tier | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-11 | 100.0 | shallow | v0.2.0 |
Probe evidence
| Probe | Outcomes |
|---|---|
| schema_integrity | pass: 1 |
Raw request/response logs are not archived yet — the outcome counts above are drawn directly from every recorded trial.
Embed this score
Available for every tool, scored or not — not a verification perk. Always links back to this page.
[](https://vouch.tools/tools/d586e334-6cfd-4776-84f0-9da6ebc38eba)