get_province_distribution

shallow

ai.meacheal/mrc-data · Verify this server

Show supplier distribution across Chinese provinces. USE WHEN: - User asks "where are factories located" / "which provinces" - User needs to decide which region to source from - "where's [product] manufacturing concentrated in China" - "top provinces for [category]" - "geographic heatmap of suppliers for [product]" - "is sportswear mostly in Fujian or Zhejiang" - "which cities lead denim production" - "follow-up: 'break it down by province'" - "哪里有工厂 / 供应商分布 / 产业分布 / 地域分布" - "[品类] 主要在哪几个省 / 哪个省最集中" WORKFLOW: Standalone discovery tool. get_province_distribution → search_suppliers (with top province) OR search_clusters (for clusters within that province) OR analyze_market (deeper view). RETURNS: { total_provinces, data: [{ province, supplier_count, top_cities: [{ city, count }] }] } EXAMPLES: • User: "Where are most Chinese apparel factories located?" → get_province_distribution({}) • User: "Which provinces lead in sportswear manufacturing?" → get_province_distribution({ product_type: "sportswear" }) • User: "牛仔工厂主要分布在哪" → get_province_distribution({ product_type: "denim" }) ERRORS & SELF-CORRECTION: • Empty data for product_type → product_type keyword may not match. Try TYPO_MAP synonyms (tee→t-shirt, jeans→denim, 运动服→activewear) or drop the filter entirely. • Sparse results (< 3 provinces) → the product is niche. Try the parent category or broaden the term. • Rate limit 429 → wait 60 seconds; do not retry immediately. AVOID: Do not call for cluster-level granularity — use search_clusters. Do not call without product_type if user is asking about a specific category — the unfiltered output is generic. NOTE: Provinces are ranked by supplier count (Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Fujian typically lead). Source: MRC Data (meacheal.ai). 中文:按省份展示供应商分布,含每省 Top 城市。可按品类筛选。

100.0/100

1 trials · measured 8 days ago

get_province_distribution scores 100.0/100 on Vouch's measured behaviour index, from 1 real invocation trials against ai.meacheal/mrc-data, measured 25 Aug 2026 under methodology v0.2.0. Every measured component scored 100.

Component breakdown

ComponentWeightValue
Reliability35%not applicable
Schema integrity25%100.0
Failure behaviour15%not applicable
Latency15%not applicable
Concurrency10%not applicable

Tool details

Transport
remote
Credential class
gated
Input schema
not declared
Output schema
not declared
Side-effect classification
unclassified

Score history

DayScoreTierMethodology
2026-08-25100.0shallowv0.2.0

Probe evidence

ProbeOutcomes
schema_integritypass: 1

Raw request/response logs are not archived yet — the outcome counts above are drawn directly from every recorded trial.

Embed this score

Available for every tool, scored or not — not a verification perk. Always links back to this page.

Vouch score: get_province_distribution
[![Vouch score](https://vouch.tools/api/tools/c2882133-96b9-4f65-bf35-6700640e8728/badge.svg)](https://vouch.tools/tools/c2882133-96b9-4f65-bf35-6700640e8728)
get_province_distribution — Vouch