get_project_context
shallowio.github.Tanbir404/zephex · Verify this server
Answer what the user's project is — name, stack, how to run/test/build, auth, database, deploy, folder layout — from their files on disk, not from training data. ALWAYS call this before you invent npm/pip/cargo commands or read package.json yourself. ALWAYS call when the user says: what is this app, what's the stack, how do I run it, how do I test, is this a monorepo, where is auth, what database, how do we deploy. If they named Zephex or MCP, call this first on their project. One topic per call. Start with topic=identity on a new folder, then follow next_calls (usually run or framework). Other topics: backend, frontend, database, auth, deploy, structure, integrations, security. This is the user's machine, any project: Node, Python, Go, Rust, Java, PHP, a monorepo, an unsaved folder. Local/stdio: omit path to use the editor cwd, or pass path as their project folder. No disk on this transport: inline_files with package.json or pyproject.toml/go.mod/Cargo.toml plus 2–4 source files. Returns topic, summary, data (identity, commands, key_paths), hint, next_calls. Copy dev/test/build from data — do not guess bun vs npm vs uv. Not for finding a function name (find_code) or reading a file body (read_code). Those come after you know what the project is. Example: get_project_context({ topic: "identity" }) then get_project_context({ topic: "run" }). Also call topic=auth before touching login, topic=database before schema work, topic=structure when you need the folder map. force:true if the project just changed. Brief is enough for orientation; do not skip this tool to save a round-trip — one identity call replaces reading several manifests.
1 trials · measured 8 days ago
get_project_context scores 100.0/100 on Vouch's measured behaviour index, from 1 real invocation trials against io.github.Tanbir404/zephex, measured 25 Aug 2026 under methodology v0.2.0. Every measured component scored 100.
Component breakdown
| Component | Weight | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 35% | not applicable |
| Schema integrity | 25% | 100.0 |
| Failure behaviour | 15% | not applicable |
| Latency | 15% | not applicable |
| Concurrency | 10% | not applicable |
Tool details
- Transport
- remote
- Credential class
- self-provisionable
- Category
- Finance & compliance
- Input schema
- not declared
- Output schema
- not declared
- Side-effect classification
- unclassified
Score history
| Day | Score | Tier | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-25 | 100.0 | shallow | v0.2.0 |
Probe evidence
| Probe | Outcomes |
|---|---|
| schema_integrity | pass: 1 |
Raw request/response logs are not archived yet — the outcome counts above are drawn directly from every recorded trial.
Embed this score
Available for every tool, scored or not — not a verification perk. Always links back to this page.
[](https://vouch.tools/tools/bd6eb31f-5ade-447b-8bbb-667b24e916a3)