screen_exposure

io.github.kedu21-beep/passage-data · Verify this server

Do these occurrence records publish where a listed species lives too precisely? Occurrence records in one call, up to 5000: each record's species name and coordinates as published, optionally coordinateUncertaintyInMeters, a place, and what the file declares about the point (dataGeneralizations, informationWithheld, the eventID, locationID or locality it shares with other records, an iNaturalist export's coordinates_obscured, geoprivacy, public_positional_accuracy). Our engine's names screen answers as it answers a file dropped on passage-data.com: for each species a register lists, `listed_by` gives which register lists it (its status, whether it applies where the records are, the line the register prints) and `exposure` how many of its records sit at a coordinate finer than a 0.01 degree grid (about 1.1 km, precise enough to walk to), and how many of those a rounding would not protect because another record states the same position (withhold those). `treatment` is Chapman 2020's, GBIF's best practice for sensitive species: the category the data holder's documented answers to its questions reach (send them as `determinations`) with its grid, the Darwin Core terms to fill and how many records it would round and withhold; without answers, a coded refusal (sensitivity.criteria_unevaluated) naming the next question, beside what each category would do. A listing is not that determination. Every register screened is named with its edition: a species no register lists is a statement about those registers, never that it is unprotected. Nothing sent is kept.