analyze_market
shallowai.meacheal/mrc-data · Verify this server
Market overview and analysis for a product category in China. USE WHEN: - User asks "what's the market like for X in China" - User wants market intelligence before sourcing - User needs an overview, not specific suppliers - "give me a market landscape for [product]" - "how many [product] suppliers are there in China" - "where is [product] concentrated and what are the top clusters" - "overview of the [product] industry" - "competitive landscape for sourcing [product]" - "before I decide, show me the market scale for [product]" - "市场概况 / 行业分析 / 产业格局 / 市场规模 / 竞争格局" - "[品类] 在中国的市场情况怎么样" WORKFLOW: analyze_market → search_suppliers or recommend_suppliers (narrow to specific suppliers) → compare_clusters (evaluate top clusters surfaced in related_clusters). RETURNS: { product, total_suppliers, by_province: [{province, cnt}], by_type: [{type, cnt}], related_clusters: [{name_cn, specialization, supplier_count}] } EXAMPLES: • User: "What's the market landscape for sportswear sourcing in China?" → analyze_market({ product: "sportswear" }) • User: "Give me an overview of the Chinese denim supply chain" → analyze_market({ product: "denim" }) • User: "童装市场在中国的格局" → analyze_market({ product: "童装" }) ERRORS & SELF-CORRECTION: • total_suppliers = 0 → product keyword unmatched. Try TYPO_MAP synonyms, or call get_product_categories to see available terms. • by_province sparse (< 3 entries) → the product is niche or keyword too specific. Try the parent category. • Rate limit 429 → wait 60 seconds; do not retry immediately. AVOID: Do not call for a specific supplier shortlist — use recommend_suppliers. Do not call for cluster details — use search_clusters. Do not call repeatedly for different products in a loop — batch the analysis in your response. NOTE: Bird's-eye view. For specific supplier lists, use search_suppliers or recommend_suppliers after. Source: MRC Data (meacheal.ai). 中文:单个品类的市场总览(总供应商数、省份分布、类型分布、相关产业带)。
1 trials · measured 8 days ago
analyze_market scores 100.0/100 on Vouch's measured behaviour index, from 1 real invocation trials against ai.meacheal/mrc-data, measured 25 Aug 2026 under methodology v0.2.0. Every measured component scored 100.
Component breakdown
| Component | Weight | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 35% | not applicable |
| Schema integrity | 25% | 100.0 |
| Failure behaviour | 15% | not applicable |
| Latency | 15% | not applicable |
| Concurrency | 10% | not applicable |
Tool details
- Transport
- remote
- Credential class
- gated
- Input schema
- not declared
- Output schema
- not declared
- Side-effect classification
- unclassified
Score history
| Day | Score | Tier | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-25 | 100.0 | shallow | v0.2.0 |
Probe evidence
| Probe | Outcomes |
|---|---|
| schema_integrity | pass: 1 |
Raw request/response logs are not archived yet — the outcome counts above are drawn directly from every recorded trial.
Embed this score
Available for every tool, scored or not — not a verification perk. Always links back to this page.
[](https://vouch.tools/tools/a37b2be4-4748-4508-ac35-73b04fbeef40)