list_meta_partnership_creators

io.github.hermoso-ai/hermoso · Verify this server

The creators this brand has set up for PARTNERSHIP ADS — ads that run from a CREATOR’s handle instead of the brand’s, which is what a paid collaboration looks like in feed. TWO SEPARATE LISTS come back and NEITHER IMPLIES THE OTHER: the AD-PERMISSION list is whose content this brand may run as an advert, and the TAG-APPROVAL list is who may tag this brand as a paid partner on their own organic post. Adding a creator to one does nothing for the other, and that is the mistake that makes a partnership ad fail for a reason Meta’s error does not name. Every row carries the status Meta reports VERBATIM. Meta’s own wording on the wire is prose, not the enum its docs publish — measured 2026-08-25, a fresh request reads “Pending Approval” and a revoked one reads “Canceled” (Partnership Ads Hub calls the same two rows “Request sent” and “Inactive”). PENDING means the creator has not accepted yet and this brand cannot advertise their content until they do. REVOKING DOES NOT REMOVE THE ROW: Meta keeps it and flips the status, so read the status rather than the presence of a row. An unrecognised status is passed through as Meta’s own word, never blanked. A list that could not be READ says exactly that; it is never rendered as "this brand has no creators". THE TWO LISTS ANSWER DIFFERENTLY, and Meta is the reason: the ad-permission list can be ENUMERATED, and the tag-approval list CANNOT — Meta requires `user_ids` on that edge and returns "a list of approved creators, filtered by the user IDs provided", i.e. it CHECKS the people you name and cannot report the rest. So pass `creatorIds` to ask about specific creators; anyone already on the ad-permission list is checked for you, which is what makes "on one list but not the other" answerable in a single call. With nobody to check, the reply says Meta publishes no way to list that edge rather than reporting a failed read. Read-only, 0 credits.