analyze_site

shallow

cloud.dchub/mcp-server · Verify this server

Use when a user has ONE specific lat/lon (a parcel, a candidate site) and wants the full multi-factor data-center suitability read in one call. Example: "Score this Phoenix parcel for a 100MW build — power, gas, fiber, market & risk." — analyze_site lat=33.45 lon=-112.07 capacity_mw=100 state=AZ. Params: lat (-90 to 90, required unless candidate_id), lon (-180 to 180, required unless candidate_id), candidate_id (a cand_… from get_refined_queue — resolves coordinates from the frozen mint and ignores lat/lon), capacity_mw (target load in MW, e.g. 50-500), state (2-letter US, optional — improves the tax-incentive/context lookup), include_grid/include_risk/include_fiber (booleans, default true). Returns (full, paid): {overall_score (aka composite_score, 0-100 composite — for the integrity-first version that never imputes a missing factor, use get_composite_site_score), interpretation (verdict string, e.g. "Excellent site"), scores{power_infrastructure, gas_pipeline_access, fiber_connectivity, market_conditions, risk_resilience — each 0-100}, nearby{substations_50km, power_plants_80km, gas_pipelines_50km, facilities_100km, fiber_carriers_in_state, generation_capacity_mw, total_capacity_mw}, power_cost{industrial_cents_kwh, commercial_cents_kwh, period, basis}, fiber{connectivity_score, nearest_carrier_km, near_net_bucket, top_carriers[], single_carrier_risk}, location, citation}. FREE tier returns a REAL, citable HEADLINE — composite_score + verdict + the single top limiting factor (the lowest sub-score) + citation; the full per-factor breakdown, nearby infrastructure, power cost, fiber carriers, and the branded Site Analysis PDF (generate_site_analysis) are Pro. For dedicated water / disaster / climate / tax reads use get_water_risk / get_disaster_risk / get_climate_intel / get_tax_incentives. Do NOT use to compare 2+ sites (use compare_sites) or to find sites that match a target (use find_alternatives).

No longer in the registry. The MCP registry stopped listing this server as of 31 Aug 2026. This report card stays available because the measurement was real, but the tool is excluded from search, rankings, and Vouch’s corpus counts. A published behaviour score is never recomputed or removed — it reflects what was measured while the server was listed.

100.0/100

1 trials · measured 8 days ago

analyze_site scores 100.0/100 on Vouch's measured behaviour index, from 1 real invocation trials against cloud.dchub/mcp-server, measured 25 Aug 2026 under methodology v0.2.0. Every measured component scored 100.

Component breakdown

ComponentWeightValue
Reliability35%not applicable
Schema integrity25%100.0
Failure behaviour15%not applicable
Latency15%not applicable
Concurrency10%not applicable

Tool details

Transport
remote
Credential class
open
Input schema
not declared
Output schema
not declared
Side-effect classification
unclassified

Score history

DayScoreTierMethodology
2026-08-25100.0shallowv0.2.0

Probe evidence

ProbeOutcomes
schema_integritypass: 1

Raw request/response logs are not archived yet — the outcome counts above are drawn directly from every recorded trial.

Embed this score

Available for every tool, scored or not — not a verification perk. Always links back to this page.

Vouch score: analyze_site
[![Vouch score](https://vouch.tools/api/tools/5b92040f-0421-4f7c-8e54-4f525041fb54/badge.svg)](https://vouch.tools/tools/5b92040f-0421-4f7c-8e54-4f525041fb54)
analyze_site — Vouch