onboard_data_source
shallowcom.dpf-it/mcp-server · Verify this server
First step of setting up a new data integration: creates a data spec. By default (sourceType "file") this returns presigned upload URL(s) for the sample file (and optional format/target-schema file) — upload the file(s) per the returned instructions, then call finish_data_source_onboarding with the returned specId to kick off AI analysis and wait for it to complete. Use sourceType "tables" instead when the request is to derive/aggregate data that is ALREADY loaded into workspace tables — e.g. "build me a daily summary of the customers table", or "set up a job that reads from the orders table and maintains a running total" — rather than loading a new file. It generates a SQL query (INSERT or MERGE, per `merge`) via AI instead of a Python parser, run through the query engine instead of a Glue job. There are never sample/format files, but targetOption still works the same three ways as sourceType "file" (see targetOption below) — so this call returns files: [] and you can call finish_data_source_onboarding immediately UNLESS targetOption is "target-schema-file", in which case it returns one upload URL for that file, same as the file-source path. The generated SQL automatically windows itself to rows added since the spec's last successful run. sourceType "tables" ALSO requires autoRefresh — how this spec stays up to date is not optional to decide, and must not be inferred from other jobs/triggers that happen to already exist in the workspace: ask the user whether it should re-run automatically whenever a specific upstream spec finishes loading ("spec_success" — the natural choice when the request is "run this after X finishes/loads"), on a plain cron-like cadence ("schedule" — the natural choice when the request is "run this every day/hour" with no mention of depending on another job), or stay manual-only ("none" — re-run later with run_data_job). If the request already states the timing unambiguously, that answers it; otherwise ask before calling this tool. Getting this wrong either way has a real cost: "none" means the summary silently goes stale until someone remembers to re-run it by hand, while an unwanted trigger keeps re-running (and charging credits for) a spec the user only wanted once. See autoRefresh below.
1 trials · measured 8 days ago
onboard_data_source scores 100.0/100 on Vouch's measured behaviour index, from 1 real invocation trials against com.dpf-it/mcp-server, measured 25 Aug 2026 under methodology v0.2.0. Every measured component scored 100.
Component breakdown
| Component | Weight | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 35% | not applicable |
| Schema integrity | 25% | 100.0 |
| Failure behaviour | 15% | not applicable |
| Latency | 15% | not applicable |
| Concurrency | 10% | not applicable |
Tool details
- Transport
- remote
- Credential class
- gated
- Input schema
- not declared
- Output schema
- not declared
- Side-effect classification
- unclassified
Score history
| Day | Score | Tier | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-25 | 100.0 | shallow | v0.2.0 |
Probe evidence
| Probe | Outcomes |
|---|---|
| schema_integrity | pass: 1 |
Raw request/response logs are not archived yet — the outcome counts above are drawn directly from every recorded trial.
Embed this score
Available for every tool, scored or not — not a verification perk. Always links back to this page.
[](https://vouch.tools/tools/3d4ab383-cf8d-4172-b97e-e5d8f0ed6667)