screening_lookup
shallowai.stonewake/stonewake · Verify this server
Screenings run for the caller's team, covering organizations and countries, and natural persons only in workspaces where person data is switched on (elsewhere a person screening answers not_found and the person filter an empty page); each row names its team (team_id, team_name; both null on a workspace wide screening every team reads). Without screening_id this lists screening runs newest first, filterable by subject_type (entity, country or person), by the subject's ids (node_id for a company from search_companies, entity_id for a registry institution from company_profile, iso3 for a country), or by subject name; paged with limit (default 20, maximum 100) and offset, and the response carries the exact total. With screening_id it returns that one run in full. First comes official_lists, a deterministic comparison of the subject with each official sanctions list it names, made when the run is read and not on the screening day, one status per list (listed only on an identifier the list itself states, name match awaiting review, name match reviewed, no entry found, or not checked with the reason; a name match is never a hit, names match exactly so other spellings are not found, and a list that was not checked never reads as clear). Each entry of an entity, vessel or aircraft carries published_fields, the fields its list publishes on it, verbatim, each with the path where the list states it; the fields that can state a natural person (free text, other parties, contact lines) are served only in workspaces where person data is switched on, elsewhere they are withheld and published_note says so. Then the adverse media verdicts per category with rationale and review state, the drafted summary, grounded findings with their press quotes, and the sources behind them. A person screening returns official_lists and its grounded findings with their sources and nothing else, never a verdict, an assessment, a drafted summary or any score, rating or ranking of the person. Findings quote reported coverage, not established fact.
1 trials · measured 1 day ago
screening_lookup scores 100.0/100 on Vouch's measured behaviour index, from 1 real invocation trials against ai.stonewake/stonewake, measured 6 Oct 2026 under methodology v0.2.0. Every measured component scored 100.
Component breakdown
| Component | Weight | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 35% | not applicable |
| Schema integrity | 25% | 100.0 |
| Failure behaviour | 15% | not applicable |
| Latency | 15% | not applicable |
| Concurrency | 10% | not applicable |
Tool details
- Transport
- remote
- Credential class
- open
- Input schema
- not declared
- Output schema
- not declared
- Side-effect classification
- unclassified
Score history
| Day | Score | Tier | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-06 | 100.0 | shallow | v0.2.0 |
Probe evidence
| Probe | Outcomes |
|---|---|
| schema_integrity | pass: 1 |
Raw request/response logs are not archived yet — the outcome counts above are drawn directly from every recorded trial.
Embed this score
Available for every tool, scored or not — not a verification perk. Always links back to this page.
[](https://vouch.tools/tools/1b6d5ef6-1565-4ca2-a57d-21ef077e8f9c)