io.github.LuxAlgo/luxalgo-mcp-server

Tools

• library_get_concept

  Explain a trading concept: the Library's full write-up as markdown — definition, formula, how traders read it, and its indicator implementations. Use for any 'what is X / how does X work' question. Needs the exact slug — find it with library_search or library_list_concepts.

  shallow
• library_get_family

  A family's hub page as markdown — the written overview of that school of analysis plus its complete concept roster. Use after library_list_families, or when the user asks about a whole area like 'SMC' or 'Wyckoff'.

  shallow
• library_get_indicator

  Details for one indicator: what it does, how to read it, family, concept links, preview image — plus whether its source code is available (fetch the code itself with library_get_source_code). Use when the user asks about a specific indicator.

  shallow
• library_get_source_code

  The full, working source code of a Library indicator (works on TradingView). Kept separate from library_get_indicator because sources are long — call it only when the user wants the code itself.

  shallow
• library_list_concepts

  Browse every trading and technical-analysis concept in the Library — paginated, optionally one family. Use to enumerate a topic area or find slugs for library_get_concept; for keyword lookup prefer library_search.

  shallow
• library_list_families

  The Library's top-level taxonomy: 17 families of trading concepts (trend, momentum, SMC/ICT, statistics, …) with concept counts and hub links. The natural first call for orientation.

  shallow
• library_list_indicators

  Browse the indicator catalog with filters and server-side sorting (newest first by default). Use for structured browsing — 'latest indicators', 'everything in the volatility family'; for keyword discovery prefer library_search.

  shallow
• library_list_tags

  The Library's indicator tag vocabulary (behavioral traits like 'Volatility', 'Trailing-Stop', 'Repainting Functionality'). Returns ids to pass as the tags filter of library_list_indicators — tags are orthogonal to the concept-family taxonomy.

  shallow
• library_search

  Search the LuxAlgo Library — the encyclopedia of trading and technical analysis. One query over 800+ concepts (alias-aware: 'stochastics' finds Stochastic Oscillator) and 800+ ready-to-use indicators. Start here whenever you have a name, informal term, or topic; results carry slugs for the get tools plus canonical URLs for citation.

  shallow
• propfirms_challenge_rules

  Fetch one directory challenge's complete ruleset (ChallengeSpec), adapted from the live LuxAlgo directory: evaluation steps (profit targets in percent units of the initial account, minimum trading days, time limits); the daily-loss rule with its exact semantics (basis = measured from prior-day balance vs prior-day equity; limitBasis = whether a pct limit is a fixed allowance of the initial balance or recomputed daily from the anchor; evaluation = breached on an intraday touch vs only at the close; includesOpenPnl = whether floating P&L can breach it); the max-loss rule and its drawdown mode (How the max-loss floor behaves - the single most consequential rule difference between firms. 'static-initial': floor fixed at initial balance minus the limit; never moves (classic CFD two-step). 'trailing-realized-eod': floor ratchets up with end-of-day balance highs; intraday highs do not move it. 'trailing-intraday-unrealized': floor trails the peak unrealized equity intraday and never stops trailing (futures-style; the most-miscalculated rule in the industry: it cuts pass probability dramatically). 'trailing-locks-at-initial': trails intraday peak equity until the floor reaches the initial balance, then freezes (common futures variant). Locking is also composable: locksAtInitial adds the same lock to an EOD trail, and lockOffsetAmount shifts the lock level to initial balance + that amount (e.g. 100 models 'stops trailing $100 above the start').); per-step consistency rules (steps[].consistency.maxBestDayProfitPct - SIMULATED: one outsized day effectively raises the target until the best-day share complies); fees (price, one-time vs monthly billing, reset fee, activation fee, refundable-on-pass); funded terms (profit split percent, payout frequency, first-payout minimum days, and funded.payoutRules - SIMULATED payout gating: minWinningDays, winningDayMinProfit, per-payout caps maxPayoutPctOfProfit/maxPayoutAmount, bufferAmount, and a windowed consistencyMaxBestDayPct gate); flagsNotSimulated (rules the entry declares but the engine does not simulate - material caveats to relay to the user); and sources (the firm-page citation when the directory serves one). The result also carries `provenance` and `inferredFields` - every rule read from free text instead of a structured column is named there; relay them and treat the firm's page as authoritative. The returned `challenge` object is exactly the shape the simulation tools accept as inline `spec`: copy it, change a rule, and re-simulate to quantify how a rule variation moves pass probability and EV. UNITS: every *Pct rule field and every percent-mode risk value is in PERCENT UNITS (5 = 5%, 0.5 = 0.5%). The one exception is winRate, which is a FRACTION in [0, 1] (0.55 = 55% winners). Probabilities in results are fractions in [0, 1]. DATA SOURCE & PROVENANCE: firm data comes live from LuxAlgo's public, keyless prop-firm directory API - the data behind luxalgo.com/prop-firms (origin overridable via the LUXALGO_APP_ORIGIN env var). Rule semantics are used verbatim where the directory serves structured rule columns; where it serves only free text, semantics are inferred ONLY when one reasonable reading exists, and every inferred field is disclosed in `inferredFields` (provenance 'directory+inferred') - relay those to the user next to any numbers. Challenges whose loss rules cannot be established are refused as not simulatable rather than guessed. Firms change rules; each firm's own page is always authoritative. NOTE: this returns the simulatable encoding of one challenge's rules; the directory listing with every captured field, plus live offers, is propfirms_get and propfirms_search_challenges.

  shallow
• propfirms_compare

  Simulate the SAME trader across several challenges (directory references and/or inline specs, up to 12) under identical options and seed, and return one row per challenge sorted by expected value. THIS IS NOT A RANKING: rows are ordered by EV for the caller's specific inputs - trader stats, risk sizing, and options - and a different trader profile reorders them. The tool computes data for the user's own decision; it implies no endorsement, league table, or recommendation of any firm, and results should be presented that way ('best EV for these inputs', never 'best firm'). Each row carries perAttemptPassProbability, fundedProbability, expectedAttempts, expectedCost, evTotal, pEvPositive, daysToFundedP50, and the challenge's flagsNotSimulated - challenges with more unsimulated rules have optimistic numbers, so compare flags alongside EV, not EV alone. Consistency rules and funded payout gating ARE simulated (engine v1), so EV already reflects them where a ruleset has them. For full per-challenge distributions run propfirms_simulate on the interesting rows. UNITS: every *Pct rule field and every percent-mode risk value is in PERCENT UNITS (5 = 5%, 0.5 = 0.5%). The one exception is winRate, which is a FRACTION in [0, 1] (0.55 = 55% winners). Probabilities in results are fractions in [0, 1]. DETERMINISM: identical inputs including `seed` reproduce byte-identical results on any platform. Include the seed and path count when reporting numbers so users can reproduce them exactly; re-run with a few different seeds to gauge Monte Carlo spread. ASSUMPTIONS: every result carries assumptions.flags - dataset-declared rules the engine does NOT simulate (e.g. scaling plans or soft daily lockouts, which make real odds worse than simulated) plus engine simplifications - and assumptions.disclaimer. These are material: always surface the flags and the disclaimer to the user alongside the numbers, never just the headline probability. Results are distributions under stated assumptions, not promises.

  shallow
• propfirms_get

  One prop firm's full dossier by slug: general profile (platforms, markets, payments, Trustpilot, restricted countries), every challenge with its rules, live offers with promo codes and affiliate links, and the written overview (about, rules, payout policy, FAQ). Find slugs with propfirms_search. Uncaptured (null) fields are omitted; challenges reference applicable offers via offerIds into the firm-level offers list. For simulated pass odds on this firm's challenges (reference archetypes, same engine as luxalgo.com/prop-firms), use propfirms_pass_rates.

  shallow
• propfirms_list_simulatable

  List the prop firms in the live LuxAlgo directory together with every simulatable challenge (challengeId, display name, account size, currency, price, and its rule-semantics provenance). Call this first to discover the firmId + challengeId pairs accepted by propfirms_challenge_rules, propfirms_simulate, propfirms_optimal_risk, propfirms_compare and propfirms_simulate_trades. Challenges whose loss-rule semantics cannot be established are listed under notSimulatable instead of being guessed. The listing is data, not endorsement: firms are alphabetical - no recommendation or ranking is implied, and none should be presented. DATA SOURCE & PROVENANCE: firm data comes live from LuxAlgo's public, keyless prop-firm directory API - the data behind luxalgo.com/prop-firms (origin overridable via the LUXALGO_APP_ORIGIN env var). Rule semantics are used verbatim where the directory serves structured rule columns; where it serves only free text, semantics are inferred ONLY when one reasonable reading exists, and every inferred field is disclosed in `inferredFields` (provenance 'directory+inferred') - relay those to the user next to any numbers. Challenges whose loss rules cannot be established are refused as not simulatable rather than guessed. Firms change rules; each firm's own page is always authoritative. NOTE: this lists only the firms and challenges whose rules the engine can encode honestly. The full directory — every visible firm with platforms, prices, payout terms, and live offers/promo codes — is served by propfirms_search, propfirms_search_challenges, and propfirms_search_offers.

  shallow
• propfirms_optimal_risk

  Sweep risk-per-trade over a grid, run the full journey simulation at every point, and report two optima separately: bestByPassProbability (the risk that maximizes a single attempt's chance of passing) and bestByEv (the risk that maximizes expected value across attempts, fees and funded payouts). They usually differ (diverges=true) - and that divergence is the insight: lower risk survives loss limits more often, but EV also weighs the cost of extra attempts and the size of funded payouts, which can favor a different risk. Never present one number as THE optimal risk; report both optima and the trade-off, and let the user choose. The sweep uses common random numbers (the same seed at every grid point), so curves are smooth and the argmax is signal, not Monte Carlo noise. Grid units follow riskMode: percent units for percent modes (default grid 0.1 to 3 in steps of 0.1, i.e. 0.1%-3% per trade), currency per trade for 'fixed-amount' (set min/max/step explicitly). Parametric trader only (riskValue is not a parameter here - the grid supplies it). Cost scales with grid size: one full simulation per point, so ~30 points at the default 10,000 paths takes roughly 10 seconds; use fewer paths or a coarser grid for a first pass, then refine around the optima. UNITS: every *Pct rule field and every percent-mode risk value is in PERCENT UNITS (5 = 5%, 0.5 = 0.5%). The one exception is winRate, which is a FRACTION in [0, 1] (0.55 = 55% winners). Probabilities in results are fractions in [0, 1]. DETERMINISM: identical inputs including `seed` reproduce byte-identical results on any platform. Include the seed and path count when reporting numbers so users can reproduce them exactly; re-run with a few different seeds to gauge Monte Carlo spread. ASSUMPTIONS: every result carries assumptions.flags - dataset-declared rules the engine does NOT simulate (e.g. scaling plans or soft daily lockouts, which make real odds worse than simulated) plus engine simplifications - and assumptions.disclaimer. These are material: always surface the flags and the disclaimer to the user alongside the numbers, never just the headline probability. Results are distributions under stated assumptions, not promises.

  shallow
• propfirms_pass_rates

  Reference challenge pass rates computed live from the directory's encoded rules with the same engine, seed (42), path count (10,000) and reference archetypes luxalgo.com/prop-firms uses — per challenge and per archetype (developing 45% win rate / consistent 48% / proven edge 52%, all risking conservatively). Returns per-attempt pass probability with 95% CI, P(funded), expected attempts and total cost, EV, payout probability, funded-blowup probability, each cell's assumption flag ids, and the ruleset's provenance (structured directory columns vs fields inferred from listing text — always relay inferred fields). Deterministic per ruleset and cached — cheap to call. These are REFERENCE odds for orientation and comparison, not the user's personal odds: for their own statistics use propfirms_simulate (summary stats) or propfirms_simulate_trades (their real trade series). Not a ranking; a firm's page is authoritative for current rules (check lastVerified). Expected costs use the directory's listed challenge prices; full firm profiles and live offers are directory data (propfirms_get, propfirms_search_offers).

  shallow
• propfirms_search

  Search LuxAlgo's prop-firm catalog (proprietary trading firms offering funded accounts). Combine firm filters (platforms, markets, payment/payout methods, country availability, Trustpilot, year founded) with nested challenge filters (account size, price, steps, profit split, trading rules) and offer filters — a firm matches when at least one of its challenges/offers matches all of them. Omit every filter to list all firms. Use include to nest the matching challenges, live offers, and the written overview; for one firm's full dossier prefer propfirms_get. Uncaptured (null) fields are omitted from results; nested challenges reference offers via offerIds into the firm-level offers list. This tool returns directory data (what exists and on what terms), not outcomes: for simulated pass odds on a challenge found here, use propfirms_pass_rates or propfirms_simulate with its firm and challenge ids.

  shallow
• propfirms_search_challenges

  Search funded-account challenges across all visible prop firms. Filter by challenge rules (account size, fee, steps, profit split, drawdown mode, news/copy/auto trading, weekend holding, …) and by parent-firm properties. Pass propfirmId to list one firm's challenges, or challengeId to fetch specific ones. include=['offers'] returns a deduplicated top-level offers list, with each challenge referencing its applicable offers via offerIds (firm-wide offers included). Uncaptured (null) rule fields are omitted from results and never match filters. This returns each challenge's listed rules and terms, not outcomes: to simulate a challenge found here pass its ids to propfirms_simulate or propfirms_pass_rates, and to screen one strategy across many challenges at once use propfirms_validate_strategy.

  shallow
• propfirms_search_offers

  Search promotional offers (discounts and promo codes) across prop firms — defaults to live (active, unexpired) offers only. propfirmId narrows to one firm; challengeId resolves the offers that apply to a challenge (firm-wide offers included). Every offer carries the promo code, discount, end date, and affiliate link.

  shallow
• propfirms_simulate

  Monte Carlo-simulate a trader with the given statistics through a prop-firm challenge and (by default) a funded horizon. Answers: "What is my chance of passing per attempt, and of ever getting funded? How many attempts and how much total money should I expect? Is this challenge positive expected value for me, and which rule actually kills my attempts?" Identify the challenge EITHER by directory reference (firmId + challengeId, discovered via propfirms_list_simulatable; firmId accepts the directory id or the firm's name) OR by a full inline `spec` object - the exact shape propfirms_challenge_rules returns, so you can fetch a directory entry, change one rule, and re-simulate to model rule variations. Provide exactly one of the two forms; providing both or neither is an error. Directory references need network access; inline specs are fully offline. The trader is described by flattened parametric fields (one clean design used across all tools): winRate (a FRACTION 0-1), avgWinR/avgLossR and optional winStdR/lossStdR in R-multiples (sizes relative to the amount risked per trade), tradesPerDay with a 'fixed' or 'poisson' day model, and risk sizing via riskMode + riskValue (percent units for percent modes). If you have the user's raw trade series rather than summary stats, prefer propfirms_simulate_trades - it preserves streaks. Returns structuredContent with the full SimResult: perAttempt.passProbability with a Wilson 95% CI and per-step pass rates plus a failure breakdown by rule (daily-loss vs max-loss vs time-limit - which tells the user WHAT to fix); journey.fundedProbability, attempts and cost distributions (cost includes prices, resets, monthly billing, activation, minus refunds), costGivenFunded and daysToFunded; perAttempt.avgDaysWhenPassed/avgDaysWhenFailed and perAttempt.stagnationDays (the longest run of days without a new equity high per attempt - the dead time between progress, which grows sharply as risk per trade shrinks); funded-stage payout distributions plus funded.payoutProbability (P(at least one payout | funded)) and funded.daysToFirstPayout - with payout gating these can be the deciding numbers, since getting funded is not the same as getting paid; ev.evTotal (mean payouts minus costs) with evStandardError and pPositive; drawdown stats; and assumptions (the fully-resolved spec/profile/options the engine actually ran, plus flags and disclaimer). Histogram arrays are omitted unless includeHistograms=true. A compact human summary is returned as text alongside. SIMULATED RULES (engine v1): consistency rules (steps[].consistency) and funded payout gating (funded.payoutRules) are actually SIMULATED, not merely flagged - a distinguishing feature of this engine. Consistency uses a rational stop rule (the trader stops a day once more profit cannot help and keeps trading until the best-day share complies - flag 'consistency-stop-rule'); payouts follow a maximum-withdrawal model (withdraw everything the rules allow above buffer/caps, never below the loss floor; balances and floors carry across payouts - flag 'funded-withdrawal-model'); a funded consistency gate is checked per payout window (flag 'funded-consistency-window-approximated'). The pre-1.0 flag id 'funded-payout-resets-account' no longer exists. UNITS: every *Pct rule field and every percent-mode risk value is in PERCENT UNITS (5 = 5%, 0.5 = 0.5%). The one exception is winRate, which is a FRACTION in [0, 1] (0.55 = 55% winners). Probabilities in results are fractions in [0, 1]. DETERMINISM: identical inputs including `seed` reproduce byte-identical results on any platform. Include the seed and path count when reporting numbers so users can reproduce them exactly; re-run with a few different seeds to gauge Monte Carlo spread. ASSUMPTIONS: every result carries assumptions.flags - dataset-declared rules the engine does NOT simulate (e.g. scaling plans or soft daily lockouts, which make real odds worse than simulated) plus engine simplifications - and assumptions.disclaimer. These are material: always surface the flags and the disclaimer to the user alongside the numbers, never just the headline probability. Results are distributions under stated assumptions, not promises. DATA SOURCE & PROVENANCE: firm data comes live from LuxAlgo's public, keyless prop-firm directory API - the data behind luxalgo.com/prop-firms (origin overridable via the LUXALGO_APP_ORIGIN env var). Rule semantics are used verbatim where the directory serves structured rule columns; where it serves only free text, semantics are inferred ONLY when one reasonable reading exists, and every inferred field is disclosed in `inferredFields` (provenance 'directory+inferred') - relay those to the user next to any numbers. Challenges whose loss rules cannot be established are refused as not simulatable rather than guessed. Firms change rules; each firm's own page is always authoritative. Composes with any broker-statistics tool: if another MCP server exposes round-trip statistics (winRate, avgWin, avgLoss) or a raw R-multiple series from the user's real trades, feed them here to answer "given my actual trading, what are my odds on this challenge and what risk should I use?". Convert currency statistics to R-multiples by dividing by the average amount risked per trade: winRate stays a fraction, avgWinR = avgWin / avgRisk, avgLossR = |avgLoss| / avgRisk.

  shallow
• propfirms_simulate_trades

  Simulate a challenge by resampling the trader's OWN R-multiple trade series with a stationary block bootstrap instead of a win-rate model. WHY THIS BEATS WIN-RATE MATH: challenge rules are breached by streaks, not by averages - a daily-loss limit dies to a cluster of losses inside one day, and a trailing drawdown dies to a losing streak right after an equity peak. Real trade series are streaky (autocorrelation, volatility clustering, edge that comes and goes), and the stationary bootstrap resamples contiguous blocks of the actual series (geometric length, mean blockMeanLength, default 5 trades), so the trader's real streak structure survives into every simulated day. A parametric model with identical summary statistics shuffles trades independently and therefore understates breach risk for streaky traders. Use propfirms_simulate when only summary stats are available; use this whenever the actual trades are. Provide the series as rSeries (array of R-multiples: each trade's P&L divided by the amount risked on it), rSeriesText (pasted JSON/CSV/whitespace text, optional 'R' suffix per value), or one of the timestamped-log inputs below; exactly one of the four, at least 10 trades, 100+ strongly recommended. Returns the same full SimResult as propfirms_simulate (structuredContent, histograms off by default) plus a text summary that also reports the sample's win rate and mean R. TIMESTAMPED LOGS: tradeLogText accepts a pasted CSV/TSV trade log with a header row (open time and R required; close time and direction optional; loose header names are matched; timestamps without an offset are read as UTC). The R-series and, unless tradesPerDay is passed, the trades-per-day rate are derived from the log, and parse warnings are surfaced in the text output. NEWS WINDOWS: with a timestamped input, newsFilter runs the simulation TWICE on the same seed and options, once on the full history and once without the trades opened inside configurable windows around scheduled releases (a built-in recurring-template calendar of high- and medium-impact events across USD, EUR, GBP, JPY, AUD, CAD, CHF, NZD, plus optional custom event times). The returned SimResult is the news-avoided scenario; structuredContent.newsComparison carries both scenarios' pass probability, funded probability and EV, the excluded-trade count, and a calendar caveat that must be relayed verbatim. PORTFOLIO MODE: tradeLogTexts (2 to 5 logs) merges several timestamped histories into one chronological series and simulates the combined account, so cross-strategy loss clustering survives. Overlap across the histories is ALWAYS analyzed and attached as structuredContent.portfolioOverlap; the text summary carries the audit-risk verdict, and a 'high' verdict is an explicit warning that a prop firm may audit or refuse payouts for correlated accounts. SIMULATED RULES (engine v1): consistency rules (steps[].consistency) and funded payout gating (funded.payoutRules) are actually SIMULATED, not merely flagged - a distinguishing feature of this engine. Consistency uses a rational stop rule (the trader stops a day once more profit cannot help and keeps trading until the best-day share complies - flag 'consistency-stop-rule'); payouts follow a maximum-withdrawal model (withdraw everything the rules allow above buffer/caps, never below the loss floor; balances and floors carry across payouts - flag 'funded-withdrawal-model'); a funded consistency gate is checked per payout window (flag 'funded-consistency-window-approximated'). The pre-1.0 flag id 'funded-payout-resets-account' no longer exists. UNITS: every *Pct rule field and every percent-mode risk value is in PERCENT UNITS (5 = 5%, 0.5 = 0.5%). The one exception is winRate, which is a FRACTION in [0, 1] (0.55 = 55% winners). Probabilities in results are fractions in [0, 1]. DETERMINISM: identical inputs including `seed` reproduce byte-identical results on any platform. Include the seed and path count when reporting numbers so users can reproduce them exactly; re-run with a few different seeds to gauge Monte Carlo spread. ASSUMPTIONS: every result carries assumptions.flags - dataset-declared rules the engine does NOT simulate (e.g. scaling plans or soft daily lockouts, which make real odds worse than simulated) plus engine simplifications - and assumptions.disclaimer. These are material: always surface the flags and the disclaimer to the user alongside the numbers, never just the headline probability. Results are distributions under stated assumptions, not promises. Composes with any broker-statistics tool: if another MCP server exposes round-trip statistics (winRate, avgWin, avgLoss) or a raw R-multiple series from the user's real trades, feed them here to answer "given my actual trading, what are my odds on this challenge and what risk should I use?". Convert currency statistics to R-multiples by dividing by the average amount risked per trade: winRate stays a fraction, avgWinR = avgWin / avgRisk, avgLossR = |avgLoss| / avgRisk.

  shallow
• propfirms_validate_strategy

  Answer 'which challenges would MY strategy actually pass?' in one call: simulate the given strategy through every simulatable challenge in the live directory (optionally scoped by productType, account-size range, priceMax, or firm) and split the results by an explicit, caller-stated bar. Describe the strategy EITHER as real trades (rSeries/rSeriesText R-multiples, preferred: the stationary block bootstrap preserves streaks, which is what breaches loss limits) OR as summary stats (winRate + avgWinR, optional spreads), plus tradesPerDay and risk sizing (riskMode + riskValue). The bar is minPassPerAttempt (a fraction, default 0.5) with optional requirePositiveEv; always state the bar when relaying results. Returns per challenge: pass probability per attempt with 95% CI, P(funded), expected attempts and total cost, EV over the funded horizon, P(EV>0), assumption flag ids, and which rule semantics were inferred from listing text. HONESTY FRAME: this is a screen of distributions for the caller's inputs and bar, NOT a ranking or endorsement; challenges whose rules cannot be encoded honestly are excluded and counted, never guessed; flagged (unsimulated) rules make numbers optimistic, so relay flags. One full simulation runs per challenge (default 5,000 paths each; results are deterministic per seed), and scopes above 40 challenges are refused rather than silently truncated: narrow the scope instead. Numbers move with risk sizing; sweep one challenge with propfirms_optimal_risk afterwards. Fees and expected costs use the directory's listed prices (live discounts are NOT applied); prices, firm profiles, and current offers are directory data (propfirms_search_challenges, propfirms_get, propfirms_search_offers).

  shallow

Embed this server’s score

Tool count and median score across every tool in this server’s corpus — honest in a way a single cherry-picked tool’s badge wouldn’t be.

[![Vouch score](https://vouch.tools/api/servers/fd737fb2-7cc0-4580-be51-fb317db8f90b/badge.svg)](https://vouch.tools/servers/fd737fb2-7cc0-4580-be51-fb317db8f90b)