io.github.Compuute/compuute-scan-api

Tools

• scan_mcp_server

  Scan a public GitHub MCP-server repository for security issues. Clones the repo (shallow, <60s, <200 MB), runs compuute-scan v0.6.2 in static analysis mode (no code execution from the target), and returns a structured report with severity counts, a 0-100 score, and the 10 most severe findings. WHEN TO USE: - Before connecting to an unknown MCP server discovered via Anthropic Registry, Smithery, mcp.so, or a Discord recommendation. - Before installing a third-party MCP-server package into a production pipeline. - As part of an agent's pre-commit / pre-deploy due-diligence step when adding new dependencies. - As one input to a multi-source trust evaluation (combine with publisher reputation, package install count, last-update recency). WHEN NOT TO USE: - For private repos. Use the on-prem CLI instead: `npx compuute-scan ./path-to-private-repo` - For deep exploitability assessment of a specific code path. This is pattern matching, not dataflow analysis. Book a manual L2-L4 audit at https://compuute.se/audit for that depth. - For non-GitHub hosts (GitLab, Bitbucket, self-hosted). v1 supports github.com only. - For repos > 200 MB or clone time > 60s. The endpoint returns a 413 or 504 in those cases — fall back to local CLI. EXPECTED RESPONSE TIME: - Median: ~1-2 seconds for small repos (<100 files). - p99: ~10 seconds for medium repos. - Hard timeout at clone=60s, scan=120s combined. EXPECTED COST: - Free tier in MVP. Future Pro tier may charge per-scan or per-month. DATA FRESHNESS: - Scanner version is reported in response.scanner.version. - L1 rule set freshness reflects compuute-scan releases — see github.com/Compuute/compuute-scan/CHANGELOG.md for the latest CVE and threat-intel response timeline. EXAMPLES: Example 1 — scan an MCP server you're evaluating: github_url = "https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/servers" → score: 0, summary: {critical: 1, high: 94, medium: 22} → top_findings include SSRF, eval, etc. → recommendation: "AVOID — 1 critical and 94 high finding(s)..." Example 2 — scan a clean reference implementation: github_url = "https://github.com/microsoft/azure-devops-mcp" → score: 90+, summary: {critical: 0, high: 1} → recommendation: "REVIEW — 1 high finding(s)..." Example 3 — scan your own dev MCP-server before publishing: github_url = "https://github.com/yourorg/your-mcp" → audit your own surface before others install it OUTPUT FIELDS (stable schema): - repo_url (str): canonical URL of the scanned repo. - score (int): 0-100, higher safer. Coarse summary, not a precision claim. - summary (object): {critical, high, medium, low, info, files_scanned}. - recommendation (str): action guidance derived from severity counts. - findings_count (int): total raw findings (may include false positives). - top_findings (list): up to 10 most severe, each with {id, title, severity, file, line, owasp, cwe}. - l0_discovery (object): MCP transport, tool count, dependency pinning. - performance (object): clone_seconds, scan_seconds, repo_size_bytes. - scanner (object): {name, version, layers_covered}. - _disclaimer (str): MANDATORY triage disclaimer. Read it. Args: github_url: Public GitHub HTTPS URL (e.g. https://github.com/org/repo). Must be public and < 200 MB. v1 is github.com only. Returns: Structured scan result. On error, returns {"error": code, "message": ...} with HTTP-style code (invalid_url, clone_failed, scan_timeout, etc.).

  shallow

Embed this server’s score

Tool count and median score across every tool in this server’s corpus — honest in a way a single cherry-picked tool’s badge wouldn’t be.

[![Vouch score](https://vouch.tools/api/servers/9758bff6-9fca-4038-b30d-fd5ae563ab3f/badge.svg)](https://vouch.tools/servers/9758bff6-9fca-4038-b30d-fd5ae563ab3f)