io.github.MagneticDogSon/fixflow

Tools

• read_kb_doc

  SECOND STEP in the troubleshooting workflow. Read the full content and solution of a specific Knowledge Base card. Returns the card content WITH reliability metrics and related cards so you can assess trustworthiness and explore connected issues. WHEN TO USE: - Call this ONLY after obtaining a valid `kb_id` from the `resolve_kb_id` tool. INPUT: - `kb_id`: The exact ID of the card (e.g., 'CROSS_DOCKER_001'). OUTPUT: - Returns reliability metrics followed by the full Markdown content of the card, plus related cards. - You MUST apply the solution provided in the card to resolve the user's issue. - After applying, you MUST call `save_kb_card` with `outcome` parameter to close the feedback loop.

  shallow
• resolve_kb_id

  FIRST STEP in any troubleshooting workflow. Search the collective Knowledge Base (KB) for solutions to technical errors, bugs, or architectural patterns. Uses full-text search across titles, content, tags, and categories. Results are ranked by relevance and success rate. WHEN TO USE: - ALWAYS call this first when encountering any error message, bug, or exception. - Call this when designing a feature to check for established community patterns. INPUT: - `query`: A specific error message, stack trace fragment, library name, or architectural concept. - `category`: (Optional) Filter by category (e.g., 'devops', 'terminal', 'supabase'). OUTPUT: - Returns a list of matching KB cards with their `kb_id`, titles, and success metrics. - If a matching card is found, you MUST immediately call `read_kb_doc` using the `kb_id` to get the full solution.

  shallow
• save_kb_card

  WRITE to the Knowledge Base. This tool has TWO modes: **MODE 1 — SAVE a new card**: Provide `content` with full Markdown following the ACTIONABLE schema below. **MODE 2 — REPORT OUTCOME**: Provide `kb_id` + `outcome` ('success' or 'failure'). WHEN TO USE: - Mode 1: After successfully fixing a bug IF no existing KB card covered it. - Mode 2: ALWAYS after applying a solution from `read_kb_doc` and running verification. INPUT: - `content`: (Mode 1) Full Markdown KB card content — follow the EXACT template below. - `overwrite`: (Mode 1) Set to True to update an existing card. - `kb_id`: (Mode 2) ID of the card to report outcome for. - `outcome`: (Mode 2) 'success' or 'failure'. - `enrichment`: (Mode 2, optional) Additional context to merge into the card when outcome is 'failure'. ━━━ CARD TEMPLATE (Mode 1) — copy this structure EXACTLY ━━━ ``` --- kb_id: "[PLATFORM]_[CATEGORY]_[NUMBER]" # e.g. WIN_TERM_001, CROSS_DOCKER_002 title: "[Short Title — max 5 words]" category: "[terminal|devops|supabase|fastmcp|network|database|...]" platform: "[windows|linux|macos|cross-platform]" technologies: [tech1, tech2] complexity: [1-10] criticality: "[low|medium|high|critical]" created: "[YYYY-MM-DD]" tags: [tag1, tag2, tag3] related_kb: [] --- # [Short Title — max 5 words] > **TL;DR**: [One sentence — what's the problem + solution] > **Fix Time**: ~[X min] | **Platform**: [Windows/Linux/macOS/All] --- ## 🔍 This Is Your Problem If: - [ ] [Symptom 1 — specific symptom or error message] - [ ] [Symptom 2 — specific error code or log line] - [ ] [Symptom 3 — environment/version condition] **Where to Check**: [console / logs / env / task manager / etc.] --- ## ✅ SOLUTION (copy-paste) ### 🎯 Integration Pattern: [Global Scope] / [Inside Init] / [Event Handler] ```[language] # [One-line comment — what this code does] [depersonalized code WITHOUT specific paths, use __VAR__ for things to replace] ``` ### ⚡ Critical (won't work without this): - ✓ **[Critical Point 1]** — [why it's essential] - ✓ **[Critical Point 2]** — [common mistake to avoid] ### 📌 Versions: - **Works**: [OS/library versions where confirmed working] - **Doesn't Work**: [OS/library versions where known broken] --- ## ✔️ Verification (<30 sec) ```bash [single command to verify the fix worked] ``` **Expected**: ✓ [Specific output or behavior that confirms success] **If it didn't work** → see Fallback below ⤵ --- ## 🔄 Fallback (if main solution failed) ### Option 1: [approach name] ```bash [command] ``` **When**: [condition to use this option] | **Risks**: [what might break] ### Option 2: [alternative approach] ```bash [command] ``` **When**: [condition] | **Risks**: [what might break] --- ## 💡 Context (optional) **Root Cause**: [1 sentence — why this problem occurs] **Side Effects**: [what might change after applying the fix] **Best Practice**: [how to avoid this in future — 1 point] **Anti-Pattern**: ✗ [what NOT to do — common mistake] --- **Applicable**: [OS, library versions, conditions] **Frequency**: [rare / common / very common] ``` ━━━ END OF TEMPLATE ━━━ RULES for ACTIONABLE cards: 1. Solution FIRST — after diagnosis, code immediately 2. Depersonalize — no names, project names, or absolute paths 3. Use `__VAR__` markers for anything the user must replace 4. One Verification command, result visible in <30 sec 5. Fallback — 1-2 options max, always include When/Risks 6. Context at End — WHY is optional reading for curious agents

  shallow

Embed this server’s score

Tool count and median score across every tool in this server’s corpus — honest in a way a single cherry-picked tool’s badge wouldn’t be.

[![Vouch score](https://vouch.tools/api/servers/02df5b05-b9e5-4859-a6b1-f2e60cb100ae/badge.svg)](https://vouch.tools/servers/02df5b05-b9e5-4859-a6b1-f2e60cb100ae)